Who Can Publish Decolonized Ethnography and Cultural Theory with the Anger it Deserves? Unclassified Lloronas and the Academic Text
Articles
Smadar Lavie
University of California, Davis
Published 2025-03-13
https://doi.org/10.15388/Anthro.2025_3
PDF

Keywords

Gloria Anzaldua
Mizrahi studies
auto-ethnography
World anthro­pology
ethnographic methodology
Palestine-Israel
transnational feminism of color
racialized classification

How to Cite

Lavie, S. (2025) “Who Can Publish Decolonized Ethnography and Cultural Theory with the Anger it Deserves? Unclassified Lloronas and the Academic Text”, Vilnius University Open Series, pp. 37–52. doi:10.15388/Anthro.2025_3.

Abstract

Gloria Anzaldúa’s autohistoria-teoria presents subaltern theorization and autoethnography as testimony. Nevertheless, subaltern women anthropologists from the Global South are not part of the North American ‘woman of color’ classification of Latinas, African-Americans, and Asians. They are therefore expected to use the U.S.-U.K. formula of dispassionate (post)colonial scholarship. The underlying assumption for the unclassified woman ethnographer from the Global South is that she comes from her country’s cosmopolitan elite. She is therefore required to deploy the detached Northern social science language. This paper calls academic publishers to remove the elite label from the unclassified Women-of-Color authorship, and publish them in the decolonized, emotive Anzaldúa auto-ethnography of bearing witness.

PDF
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.